نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی -پژوهشی کاربردی
نویسندگان
1 گروه علوم سیاسی و روابط بین الملل، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 استاد گروه روابط بین‌الملل دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
3 استادگروه مطالعات منطقه ای، دانشکده روابط بین الملل، وزارت امور خارجه، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
رTIran's geopolitical position is incompatible with isolationism and an extrovert and active foreign policy to advise policy makers. On the impact of the recent nuclear agreement is an important position, was called according to analysts, academics and politicians agreement century. A recent agreement is the result of policies of various governments that can disputed Islamic Republic of Iran miniature road map for policies consistent with the geopolitical status of the issues as well. Our research with a descriptive/ analytic and library survey to examine the three states of Islamic Republic of Iran approaches in nuclear talks.
In this study, according to the object under study, the research method used, Descriptive and analytic method in which the use of library resources and foreign and local media for arguments research, there are founding compelling justification. The relationship between politics and geographical space and dynamic bilateral relationship.has needs Any policy protests geographical its own space and every space its own policy. Having regard to geographical and geopolitical realities can be a critical factor in the state 's policy actions Islamic Republic of Iran on the nuclear issue began in 1382 and ended with the recent agreement. Have been implemented approaches three:1-collusion 2-contrast 3- Engagement With the exception of the third approach, interactive management with a view to national interests, other models of nuclear crisis management have not been able to play an effective role in maintaining and securing national interests.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
', './data/jgeoq/coversheet/cover_fa.jpg'))