جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی منطقه‌ای

جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی منطقه‌ای

برساخت جمعی مفهوم التقاط گرایی معماری در مقیاس های جغرافیایی با تاکید بر نظریه کنشگر -شبکه

نوع مقاله : مقاله های برگرفته از رساله و پایان نامه

نویسندگان
گروه معماری، واحد همدان، دانشگاه ازاداسلامی، همدان، ایران
10.22034/jgeoq.2026.564990.4383
چکیده
توسعه جامعه، بار معنایی مفاهیم مختلف حرفه‌ای را افزایش داده و منجر به ابهام در تفسیر، آنها می‌شود. با افزایش جامعیت تبادل کنش‌های انسانی، این عدم قطعیت در تفسیر به پدیده‌ای رایج در زمینه‌های مختلف تبدیل شده است. در حوزه معماری، تأکید بیش از حد معمار بر تجربه و خلاقیت شهودی، منجر به قضاوتی بر پایه‌ تجربه شخصی وی در مواجهه با مفاهیم مبهم، شده است. علاوه بر این، خوانایی منطقی اهداف «جعبه سیاه» در حوزه حرفه‌ای برای سایر رشته‌های تخصصی و عموم مردم دشوار شده است. «التقاط‌گرایی» یک مفهوم معماری تفرقه‌انداز است که از تبادل فرهنگی پدید آمده است. هدف از این پژوهش توسعه ابزاری‌ است که بتواند همگام با برنامه‌ی ششم توسعه کشور، به تولید علم (با توسعه رویکرد پژوهشی جامعه‌شناسی در حوزه معماری در جهت تبدیل مفاهیم پیچیده و مبهم به ساده) بپردازد که ارائه نگاهی نوین به صورت واضح و جامع و فرارشته‌ای به ویژگی‌های التقاط-گرایی معماری، می‌باشد در جهت پاسخگویی به این دو سؤال پژوهش: 1) چگونه می‌توان روشی را توسعه داد که بتواند مفاهیم پیچیده معماری را به صورت واضح و جامع، بیان کند. 2) نحوه ارتباط تفسیر معاصر التقاط‌گرایی با توسعه اجتماعی جوامع به چه صورت می‌باشد. فرضیه پژوهش این است که معماری التقاطی از بین نرفته بلکه به صورت بیان انتزاعی و غیرعینی‌ ادامه یافته است که با افزایش درجه توسعه اجتماعی، ویژگی‌های التقاطی ملموس و واضح به سمت ضمنی و انتزاعی‌تر پیش می‌رود.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Collective construction of the concept of architectural eclecticism at geographical scales with emphasis on actor-network theory

نویسندگان English

Reza Oryaninezhad
Sara Zarnegarzadeh shirazi
Department of Architecture, Ha. c., Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran
چکیده English

The development of society has increased the semantic load of various professional concepts and led to ambiguity in their interpretation. With the increasing comprehensiveness of the exchange of human actions, this uncertainty in interpretation has become a common phenomenon in various fields. In the field of architecture, the architect's excessive emphasis on experience and intuitive creativity has led to a judgment based on his personal experience in dealing with ambiguous concepts. In addition, the logical readability of the "black box" objectives in the professional field has become difficult for other specialized disciplines and the general public. "Eclecticism" is a divisive architectural concept that has emerged from cultural exchange. The aim of this research is to develop a tool that can, in line with the Sixth National Development Plan, produce science (by developing a sociological research approach in the field of architecture to transform complex and ambiguous concepts into simple ones) that provides a new, clear, comprehensive, and transdisciplinary look at the characteristics of architectural eclecticism in order to answer these two research questions: 1) How can a method be developed that can express complex architectural concepts clearly and comprehensively? 2) How is the contemporary interpretation of eclecticism related to the social development of societies? The research hypothesis is that eclectic architecture has not disappeared, but has continued as an abstract and non-objective expression, and with the increase in the degree of social development, tangible and explicit eclectic characteristics move towards more implicit and abstract ones.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Intuition
Transdisciplinarity
Eclecticism
Network Actor Theory
Conflict Mapping
Norouzi Chakli, Abdolreza, Hassanzadeh, Mohammad, Noormohammadi, Hamzeh Ali and Etemadifard, Ali. (2009). Fifteen years of Iranian science production in the databases of the Institute for Scientific Information, Quarterly Journal of Library and Information Organization Studies, 20 (1), 175.
Hossein Ahmadi (2023) Delineating the scientific structure of the field of cultural heritage protection and restoration using co-occurrence analysis of vocabulary. Cultural Heritage Journal 2(3) 48-63.
Dehghan, Shirin. (2007). Production of Library and Information Science Information in Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Egypt. Journal of Library and Information Science, 37(3), 235-248.
Ghobadian, V. (2013) Stylistic and theorerical foundations of contemporary architecture in iran, Tehran: institute of Architects.
Banimasoud, A. (2011) Iran Contemporary Architecture, Tehran: Art & Architecture Centtury Publication.
Maslahajjoo, Amir (2025) "Architecture and Postmodernism in the Iranian Style (Analysis of Contemporary Iranian Architecture Through the Ages)" Specialized Scientific Journal of City Identity, Volume 5, Number 5, Pages 35 to 50.
Aghaian, Shirin. (2024) "A Comparative Study of the Eclectic Style in Contemporary Architecture and Western Architecture", Scientific Journal of Contemporary Architectural Heritage and Urban Planning, (1), (44-65).
Zare, Fatemeh. (2021) "The Role of Network Reception on the Interaction of Collective Design Actors", Bagh Nazar Scientific Journal, 99(18) 65-78.
Sardari, Maziar (2022) "Redefinition of architectural styles during the imposed war period with the approach of identifying traditional works (Case study: the structure of landmark buildings)", Islamic Architecture Research 11(1), 137-160.
Sharifzadeh, Rahman. (2015) Technology, Agency and Decision. Journal of Cultural Strategy (34), 115-136.
Shayan, Hamid Reza. (2012) "Analytical approach to the process of formation of modern architecture in Iran (in the first and second period after the revolution)", Naqsh-e Jahan Scientific Journal, 2, 40-58.
Mahla, Jafarzadeh. (2012) "A Comparative Study of Contemporary Iranian Architectural Approaches: Recognizing Theory in the Works of Three Generations of Architects", Green Architecture Quarterly, Volume (10), No. 8, 20-38.
Amanpour, Maryam. (2022) "A Comparative Comparison of Some of the Architectural Works of Karim Taherzadeh and Hossein Sheikh Zein al-Din in Dealing with Tradition", Research and Studies in Iranian Islamic Architecture, Volume 6(1), 120-136.
Jahandar Lashgi, Hanieh. (2018) "A Study of Postmodern Architecture after the Islamic Republic" Fourth National Conference on Architecture and Sustainable Cities.
Gonbadi, Qanbar (2014) "A Study of the Beginning of the Postmodern Era in Iran and the West", International Conference on Research in Science and Technology.
Sadeghi, Shahrzad. (2015) "Investigating the Effective Factors and Eclectic Architectural Methods in Markov's Works", Biennial Conference on Society and Architecture.
Pourjafar,M&Mahmoodinejad, H(2012)”Essay on Iran Architecture Division”, Abadi,2.
Farrokhi Kakesh, Hadith. (2016) Explaining the ontological framework of Bronnulator realism, Master's thesis in Philosophy of Science and Technology under the supervision of Dr. Mostafa Taghavi, Sharif University of Technology.
Sharifzadeh, Rahman. (2018) Negotiation with Bronnulator Objects and Network Actor Theory, Tehran, Ney Publishing House.
Haji Shirazi, Reyhaneh. (2012) Presenting the role of information technology in cognitive development in Iran using actor-network theory, Master's thesis in Information and Technology Management.
Sharifzadeh Rahman. (2020) A critique of the book Understanding Social Science from the Perspective of Network Actor Theory, Journal of Critical Research in Humanities Texts and Programs, 20 (5), 201 – 221.
Zahrani, Davood et al. (2021) Non-directed agencies in superhuman sociology; An analysis of the nature and position of agency in superhuman approaches in sociology, with an emphasis on the actor-network theory. Cultural Sociology, 12 (2), 81-116.
Mohammadi, Shadi. (2011) Reconstruction and investigation of the metaphysical elements of the agent-bronulator network theory, Mind Quarterly, 52, 139-172.
Daniali, Aref. (2020) Social Pluralism-Foundation as Meta-Narrative, Philosophical Quarterly of Cognition, 13(2), 33-58.
Sharifzadeh, Rahman. (2014) Critique and evaluation of ontological and methodological elements of the Bronnulator Network Actor Theory, PhD thesis in the field of Philosophy of Science and Technology, supervised by Dr. Gholamhossein Moghadam Heidari and advised by Dr. Hamidreza Ayatollahi, Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Ritzer, George and Goodman, Douglas J. (2013) Modern Sociological Theory, translated by Hamid Mirzaei and Abbas Lotfizadeh, Tehran, Sociologists.
Browning, G., A. Halcli, and F. Webster, Eds. 2000. Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of the Present. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. 9780761959267. doi:10.4135/9781446218310.
Hansen, L. H. rapport nr. 2001. The Division of Labour in post-industrial Societies. Gothenburg: Göteborg studies in sociology 5.
Danto, A. C., and L. Goehr. 1997. After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History (Vol. 197). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wissink, B. 2013. “Enclave Urbanism in Mumbai: An actor-network-theory Analysis of Urban (Dis) Connection.” Geoforum 47: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.02.009.
Venturini, T. 2010. “Diving in Magma: How to Explore Controversies with actor-network Theory.” Public Understanding of Science 19 (3): 258–273. doi:10.1177/0963662509102694.
Venturini, T. 2012. “Building on Faults: How to Represent Controversies with Digital Methods.” Public Understanding of Science 21 (7): 796–812. doi:10.1177/0963662510387558.
Canclini, N. G. 2014. Art beyond Itself: Anthropology for a Society without a Story Line. Durham: Duke University Press.
Latour, B. 1996. “On Actor-Network Theory: A Few Clarifications.” Soziale welt 47 (4):369-381.
Law, J., and J. Hassard. 1999. Actor Network Theory and after. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
Saremi, A. (2011) “Architectural place in the world today” Abadi, 2728.
Carpo, M. 2005. “Architecture: Theory, Interdisciplinarity, and Methodological Eclecticism.” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 64 (4): 425–427. doi:10.2307/25068195.
Kazhar, N. 2016. “Lessons of History and Search for “New Global Style” in Architecture.” Architecture and Engineering 1 (1): 19–25. doi:10.23968/2500-0055-2016-1-1-19-25.
Dehbashi, M. (2012) "Stylistic trends of contemporary architecture," Abadi 52
Falamaki, M. (1992) Experiences in shaping the architecture of Iran and the West, Tehran: Space Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Kiani, Mostafa. 2004. The Architecture of the First Pahlavi Era- The Transformation of Ideas, the Emergence and Formatron of Twenty Years of Contemporary Iranian Architecture 1320-1299. Tehran: Nazar Cultural and Research Institute.
Mahdavinejad, MJ.; Bemanian, MR. & Molaei, M. (2011) "Field oriented design process - Architecture Experience 2008-2009” Naghsh-e-Jahan 1.-*8
Kidney, W. C. 1974. The Architecture of Choice. New York: Eclecticism in America, 1880-1930. G. Braziller.
Jencks, C. A. 1978. “The Language of post-modern Architecture.” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 37: 2.
Steen, A. P. 2015. “Radical Eclecticism and Post-Modern Architecture. Fabrications: The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians.” Australia and New Zealand 25 (1): 130–145.
Sheppard, A. 2006. Some Thoughts on Canadian and American Eclecticism in Public Architecture. Montreal: McGill University, 1000–1036.
Sahar Najjar Lashkari (2022) "Drawing a structural map of educational management knowledge in Iran: Co-occurrence analysis of terms".
Latour, B . 2007. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 9780199256051.
Latour, B. 1999. “On Recalling ANT.” The Sociological Review 47 (1_suppl): 15–25. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03480.x.
Von Bertalanffy, L. 1987. [General System Theory]. Beijing, China: Social Sciences Academic Press.
Howell, R. J. 2007. “The Knowledge Argument and Objectivity.” Philosophical Studies 135 (2): 145–177. doi:10.1007/s11098-007-9077-0.
Van Eck, N. J., and L. Waltman. 2010. “Software Survey: VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping.” scientometrics 84 (2): 523–538. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
Van Eck, N. J., and L. Waltman. 2017. “Citation-based Clustering of Publications Using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer.” Scientometrics 111 (2): 1053–1070. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7.
Vivant, E. 2018. “Experiencing research-creation in Urban Studies.” Lessons from an Inquiry on the Making of Public Space. Cities 77: 60–66.
Zhang, F. H. 2008. [History of Beijing Architecture in Modern Period]. Beijing, China: Tsinghua University Press.
Jiang, L. 2013. “[The Modernization of Chinese Traditional Architecture – Research Summary of Papers on Fragrant Hill Hotel].”, no. 11: 85–86.
Fujimori, T. 2010. [Japanese Modern Architecture]. Jinan, China: Shandong People’s Publishing House Co.