Department of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Art, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD of Urban Planning, Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D., Professor, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Urban regeneration and regeneration of decaying tissues has been called. Clever management in combination with the participation of role-makers and attention to contextual features is one of the main reasons for the success of these projects. Experiences based on the last three decades in Iran indicate that the importance of intervening in declining urban areas, given the evolution of this attitude, is one of the major challenges facing urban practitioners. If the lack of an integrated approach based on intervention aimed at creating mobility, dynamics and wealth in the declining zones is one of the most important reasons for failure of these projects. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to identify the causes of deterioration and inefficiencies in urban contexts. To this end, firstly, by reviewing the theories and views of experts on this subject, we will examine the concept of deterioration and causes of burnout in urban contexts, drawing on Western European experiences in urban regeneration and regeneration. Secondly, by analyzing the regeneration approach as a new and integrated approach and the role of social, economic dimensions as crucial elements in the declining zones interventions. In the third stage, the economic and social paradigm and concepts such as participation and wisdom management are explored to enhance the theoretical knowledge in the field of urban interventions and rely on this theoretical knowledge to develop more effective policies to achieve an integrated approach to intervention.

Keywords

References

حناچی، پیروز و ایزدی، محمد سعید (1393)، بازآفرینی شهری، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، چاپ اول، تهران.
دیوید، فردآر (1388)، مدیریت استراتژیک محمد اعرابی و علی پارسایین، دفتر پژوهش‌های فرهنگی، چاپ سیزدهم، تهران.
سازمان نوسازی شهر تهران (1393)، ضرورت تغییر رویکرد در مدیریت و احیاء نوسازی و بهسازی بافت فرسوده شهر تهران، معاونت هماهنگی و برنامه‌ریزی، تهران.
ﺻﺤﯽ زاده، م. اﯾﺰدی، م (1383)، ﺣﻔﺎﻇﺖ و ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﺷﻬﺮی: دو روﯾﮑﺮد ﻣﮑﻤﻞ ﯾﺎ ﻣﻐﺎﯾﺮ ﻣﺠﻠﻪ آﺑﺎدی، سال 14، شماره 43، تهران، صص37-59.
ﻋﻨﺪﻟﯿﺐ، ع (1389)، اﺻﻮل ﻧﻮﺳﺎزی ﺷﻬﺮی روﯾﮑﺮدی ﻧﻮ ﺑﻪ بافت‌های ﻓﺮﺳﻮده ﭼﺎپ اول. اﻧﺘﺸﺎرات آذرﺧﺶ، تهران.
ﻏﻀﻨﻔﺮی، پ. (1389)، ﻣﺠﻤﻊ ﺑﺎزآﻓﺮﯾﻨﯽ ﺷﻬﺮی اﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎن و معرفی ﺑﻬﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﺳﺎزی ﺷﻬﺮی در اﯾﻦ کشور­ (2009)، ﻧﺸﺮﯾﻪ ﻧﻮﺳﺎزی ﺷﻬﺮ ﺗﻬﺮان، تهران.
لطفی، سهند­ (1387)، حفاظت و بازآفرینی شهری: مفاهیم و شرایط رساله دکتری شهرسازی، دانشکده شهرسازی، پردیس هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران.
عظیمی آملی، جلال، جمع‌دار، اکبر­ (1395)، بازآفرینی بافت‌های فرسوده شهری باتاکید بر الگوی حکمروایی خوب (نمونه موردی: محله ده ونک، منطقه 3 تهران)، فصلنامه جغرافیا (برنامه ریزی منطقه‌ای), 7 (1), 85-99.
عظیمی آملی، جلال، ارشادی وهرام، سمر­ (1396)، مدیریت شهری محله محور با رویکرد برنامه‌ریزی مشارکتی (نمونه: محله‌های شهری منطقه 1 شهرداری تهران)، فصلنامه جغرافیا (برنامه ریزی منطقه‌ای)، 7 (2)، 21-40.
لطفی، صدیقه، پریزادی، طاهر، نجاتی، ارغوان­ (1397)، تحلیل فضایی زیست‌پذیری محلات شهری (مطالعه موردی منطقه 10 تهران)، فصلنامه جغرافیا (برنامه ریزی منطقه‌ای)، 8 (4)، 7-22.
Beauregard. and Robert A. (1993): Voices of Decline. Blackwell, Cambridge.
Cheshire, Paul. and Hay, Dennis. (1989): Urban Problems in Western Europe, an economic analysis, London
Cowan, R. (2005): The Dictionary of Urbanism, Streetwise Press, Tilbury.
Carter, Andrew. (2000): Strategy and Partnership in Urban Regeneration. A handbook, London.
Couch, Chris. Fraser, Charles. (2003): Introduction: the European Context and Theoretical Framework in Urban Regeneration. Blackwell, Cambridge.
Carter, Andrew. (2000): Strategy and Partnership in Urban Regeneration. A handbook, London.
DiGaetano, Alan. Storm, Elizabeth. (2003): Comparative Urban Governance. An Integrated Urban Affaires Review, Vol 38. No 4. London.
Davis, Jonathan. (2004): Conjuncture or Disjuncture? Institutionalist Analysis of Local Regeneration Partnership in the UK, in International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28. 3. londin.
Dabinett, Gordon. (2005): Partnership and Transformation of the State in Urban Britain, Aldershot.
Elander, Ingemar. (2002): Partnership and Governance. International Social Journal, 172/2002, London.
Hall, Petter. and Ward, Colin. (1998): Sociable Cities, the 21st-Century Reinvention of the Garden City, USA.
Lang, Thilo. (2005): Urban Decline and Urban Regeneration. Working Paper, Leibniz, Institute for regional Development and Structural Planning, London.
Malizia, Emil. Feser, Edward. (2003): Understanding Local economic Development: Urban Studies, USA, Vol 37, No5.
Pierre, Jon. (2005): Comprehensive Urban Governance. Urban Affaires Review, London,
 Vol. 40, No. 4
Pierre, Jon. (1999): Models of Urban Governance. The Institutional Dimension of Urban Policies. Urban Affairs Review,London, Vol 34, No 3.
Parkinson, Micheal. (1988): Urban Revitalization in America and UK. Handbook, Manchester.
Roberts, Peter. (2000): The evolution Definition and Purpose of Urban regeneration. A Handbook, London.
Roberts, Peter. (2000): The Evolution Definition and Purpose of Urban regeneration. A Handbook, London.
Scott, Allen. and Stroper, Micheal. (2003): Region, Globalization, Development. Regional Studies, USA, Vol 37, No 6 & 7.
Geography (Regional Planning)
Volume 9, Issue 37
March 2019
Pages 881-898

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics