Geography and Regional Planning

Geography and Regional Planning

Investigating the conditions of loss in civil liability in Iranian and British law in line with regional planning and sustainable development

Authors
Seyedeh Narges Fatemi 1
Vahid Ghasemi Ahd 2
Seyed Vahid Lajevardi 3
1 PhD student, Department of Law, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Private Law, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.
10.22034/jgeoq.2024.253564.2768
Abstract
Undoubtedly, every common sense dictates that anyone who causes harm to another under any name and under any circumstances must compensate the harm caused to the harmed person in accordance with the governing principles regarding civil responsibility and support for the harmed person, except in cases where the harm is caused. to another according to the law, or the damage done to the person appears illegal and unusual. On the other hand, any damage caused by civil liability will not be claimable, but the nature of its claimability is conditional on the existence of the conditions that the law-makers of the studied legal systems have examined in various subjects. On the other hand, taking into account that the occurrence of harmful events for humans is inevitable; Therefore, human beings have always sought to establish rules based on which to impose responsibility on the person who played the biggest role in the harmful incident. Therefore, the whole mission of civil responsibility is to identify such rules. Therefore, the purpose of the current research is to examine the conditions of loss in the civil liability of Iran, England, the European principles of civil liability law and the American civil liability statements; And the question raised about each of the laws will be relative to the issue of harm. The research method in this research is descriptive-analytical, and the findings show that there are similarities in some cases and differences in some cases in discussing the conditions of loss in each
Keywords
Damage
liability
civil liability
compensation
بهرامی، حمید (۱۳۹۳). ضمان قهری. تهران: دانشگاه امام صادق (علیه السلام).
تقی‌زاده، ابراهیم و هاشمی، احمدعلی (1397). مسئولیت مدنی (ضمان قهری). تهران: دانشگاه پیام نور.
جعفری لنگرودی، محمدجعفر (1396). دوره حقوق مدنی: حقوق تعهدات (جلد 1). تهران: گنج دانش.
جعفری لنگرودی، محمدجعفر (1397). دوره مبسوط در ترمینولوژی حقوق. تهران: گنج دانش.
ره پیک، حسن (1395). حقوق مسئولیت مدنی و جبران‌ها. تهران: انتشارات خرسندی.
زمانی، مجتبی و رضوان طلب، محمد رضا (1398). گونه‌شناسی ضررهای غیرمستقیم در مسئولیت قهری. مطالعات تطبیقی فقه و اصول، شماره 2.
شهیدی، مهدی (1401). آثار قراردادها و تعهدات. تهران: مجد.
صفایی، حسین و رحیمی، حبیب‌الله (1397). مسئولیت مدنی؛ الزامات خارج از قرارداد. تهران: سمت.
غمامی، مجید (1388). ضرر در مسئولیت مدنی. تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشارات.
قریشی، علی‌اکبر (1376). قاموس قرآن (ج‌3). تهران: دارالکتب الاسلامیه.
کاتوزیان، ناصر (1385). حقوق مدنی، ضمان قهری، مسئولیت مدنی. تهران: نشر دادگستر.
کاتوزیان، ناصر (1386). حقوق مدنی، الزام‌های خارج از قرارداد: ضمان قهری. تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
کاتوزیان، ناصر (1400). الزام‌های خارج از قرارداد (ج1). تهران: گنج دانش.
کاتوزیان، ناصر (1400). دوره مقدماتی حقوق مدنی: اموال و مالکیت. تهران: میزان.
نجفی، شیخ محمدحسن (1404ق). جواهر الکلام فی شرح شرائع الاسلام (جلد 37 و 43). قم: المکتبه الاسلامیه.
Ashley, P. S., Palmer, B., & Aldersey-Williams, J. (2014). An international issue: ‘Loss of profits’ and ‘consequential loss’. Business Law International, 15(3).
Coulthard, W., & Cifelli, R. (2017). Consequential loss: Do you know what you are excluding? Retrieved October 17, 2019, from http://jws.com.au/en/insights/articles/2017-articles/consequential-loss-do-you-know-what-you-are-exclud
Elguzouli-Daf v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and Another [1995] 1 All ER 833 / McBreaty v. Ministry of Defense and Others [1994] The Times, November 23.
Harpwood, V. (2009). Modern tort law (7th ed.). New York: Routledge-Cavendish.
Honore, T. (1995). The morality of tort law: Questions and answers. In D. G. Owen (Ed.), Philosophical foundation of tort law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Jarva, D. (2017). What is indirect loss and how to compensate it? Retrieved October 17, 2019, from https://lindblad.fi/en/indirect-loss-compensate.
Munroe, J. (1997). Acrylics Ltd. v. London Fire and Civil Defense Authority and Others (2 All ER 865).
Suff, M., & Bourne, N. (2000). Essential contract law (2nd ed.). London: Routledge-Cavendish Publishing.