Geography and Regional Planning

Geography and Regional Planning

Explaining the physical identity of contemporary public buildings architecture in the geographical area of Tehran

Authors
Seyede Sara Ebne Reza 1
Hamid Majedi 2
Farah Habib 2
1 PhD student, Department of Architecture, Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/jgeoq.2024.314935.3404
Abstract
One of the most important issues and challenges facing developing societies is the physical identity of buildings and urban appearance. Cities are affected by modernity under the influence of modernity, and the concept of urban identity in the process of cognition and perception, presents us with a multidimensional and complex phenomenon. The physical identity of cities has become an influential category in city life. This article follows the hypothesis that the physical identity shaping the contemporary architecture of Tehran emerges from the heart of the subject of the project and the physical identity is the result of the current conditions of society. What are the cities of Tehran? The research method in this research is qualitative survey and applied research and to answer the research question, first the library method to examine the factors affecting the formation of physical identity, then a questionnaire was asked from experts and professors of architecture. . The statistical population is 150 professors of architecture and finally, among the effective factors and has the highest priority in designing spaces with the identity of the physical structure of the spirit of the time, adaptation of form and function and attention to human beings in design, has the most impact.
Keywords
Physical identity
public buildings
architecture of public buildings
contemporary architecture of Tehran
پاکزاد ، ج. عناصر و کیفیت های منظر یک فضای شهری ، دو فصلنامه آبادی ، 1390 ، شماره 37
گیدنز ، آ . تجدد و تشخص ، جامعه و هویت شخصی در عصر جدید ، ترجمه ناصر موفقیان ، نشر نی ، تهران ، چا اول ، 1378
جنکنز ، ر. هویت اجتماعی ، ترجمه تورج یاراحمدی ، تهران ، نشر شیرازه ، 1381
الکساندر ، ک ، معماری و راز جاودانگی :راه بی زمان ساختن ، ترجمه مهرداد قیومی بید هندی ، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی تهران ، 1381
بذرگر.م.شهرسازی و ساخت شهر ، شییراز ، کوشا مهر ، 1388
بنتلی .ای ین و دیگران . محیط های پاسخده. ترجمه مصطفی بهزاد فر .تهران .دانشگاه علم و صنعت . 1382
.لینچ.ک.تئوری شکل خوب شهر . ترجمه حسین بحرینی . تهران و انتشارات دانشگاه تهران . 1376
.حجت. ع.هویت انسان ساز . انسان هویت پرداز (تاملی در رابطه هویت و معماری ). نشریه هنرهای زیبا ، 1384 شماره 24
.تقی زاده ، م.ادراک زیبایی و هویت شهر . اصفهان .سازمان فرهنگی تفریجی شهرداری اصفهان . 138
.بهزاد فر . هویت شهر .نگاهی به هویت شهر تهران .انتشارات شهر . چاپ اول تهران . 1386
Barresi, John Barresi. (2002),“From "the Thought is the Thinker" to "the Voice is the Speaker": William James and the Dialogical Self”, In Theory & Psychology, Vol.12, No.2, 237-250.
Canter, David, (1977), The Psychology of Place, the architectural press, London.
Epstein, Seymour, 1973, “The Self-Concept Revisited”, In American Psychologist,No.28, pp.404-414.
Giuliani, Maria Vittoria, (2003), “Theory of Attachment and Place Attachment”, In:Bonnes, Mirilia (eds),Psychological Theories for Environmental Issues, ASHGATE.
Gustafson, Per, (2001), “Meaning of Place: Everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, No. 21, pp. 5-16.
Haugh, AshildLappegard, (2007), “Identity and Place: a critical comparison of three identity theories”, in Architectural Science Review, Vol.50, No.1, pp. 44-
Kaplan, Stephen, (1992), “The Restorative Environment: Nature and Human Experience”. In: Relf, Diane (edt). The Role of Horticulture in Human Well-Being and Social Development, Timber Press.
Kaplan, Stephen, (1995), “THE RESTORATIVE BENEFITS OF NATURE: TOWARD AN INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK”, In Journal of Environmental Psychology, No.15, pp. 169-182
Kaplan, S, (1995), “The Restirative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework”, In Journal of Environmental Psychology, No. 15, pp. 169-182.
Korpela, K.M, (1989), “Place-identity as a product of environmental self regulation”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, No.9, pp.241-256.
Norberg- Schulz, C, (1980), Genius Loci: toward a phenomenology of architecture, Rizzoli, New York.
Polkinghorne, Donald E, (1991), “Narrative and Self Concept”, In Journal of Narrative and Life History, No. 2&3 , pp. 135-153
Proshansky, Harold M, (1978), “The City and Self Identity”, In Environment and Behavior, No.10, pp. 147- 169
Proshansky, Harold M. (1983), “Place Identity: Physical World Socialization of the Self”,In Journal of Environmental Psychology, No.3, pp. 57-83
Rapoport, Amos, (1982), The Meaning of the Built Environment, A Nonverbar communication Approach, SAGE.
Sarbin, Theodor R, (1983), “Place Identity as a Component of Self: An Addendum”,In Journal of Environmental Psychology, No.3, pp. 337-342
Twigger-Ross, Clare L. &Uzzel , David L, (1996), “Place and Identity Processes”, In Journal of Environmental Psychology, No. 16, pp. 205–220.
Twigger-Ross, Clare, Bonaiuto, Marino, Breakwell, Glynis, (2003), “Identity Theories and Environmental Psychology”,In: Bonnes, Mirilia (eds). Psychological Theories for Environmental Issues, ASHGATE.