Geography and Regional Planning

Geography and Regional Planning

Regional interactions and conflicts in multi-level international environmental proceedings and pluralism at different levels of justice administration

Authors
Department of Law, Ker.C., Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran.
10.22034/jgeoq.2025.555466.4354
Abstract
In recent years, with the increase in global environmental challenges, traditional approaches to environmental management have not been able to respond well to these issues. In this regard, the concept of multilevel environmental litigation has been proposed as a new approach to decision-making and implementation of environmental policies. This system includes complex interactions that are established between international, regional, national and local levels and provides the necessary capacity for greater coordination, flexibility and participation of different stakeholders. The aim of this research is to examine the interactions and conflicts existing in the international multilevel environmental litigation system and to identify the challenges arising from the plurality at different levels of litigation with an emphasis on the implementation of environmental justice. This research seeks to answer the question: How can the existing conflicts at the levels of environmental decision-making and institutional plurality affect the implementation of environmental justice? The main hypothesis of the research is that the existence of multiple levels of litigation without proper coordination leads to weakness in the implementation of environmental justice and exacerbates inequalities in the distribution of environmental benefits and burdens. Using a descriptive-analytical method and utilizing qualitative data available in scientific, international sources and case studies, this research analyzes the current state of multi-level environmental litigation and shows that the lack of coordination between international, regional and national institutions, in addition to creating conflicts in policies, prevents the achievement of a fair system in environmental management.
Keywords

1.     Agyeman, J. (2003). Just sustainabilities: Development in an unequal world . Earthscan.
2.     Baker, S. (2016). Global Environmental Governance and the Role of the State. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning , 18(3), 265–280.
3.     Baker, S. (2022). Global environmental law and policy . Routledge.
4.     Biermann, F. (2007). Earth System Governance as a Crosscutting Theme of Global Change Research. Global Change Research , 10(4), 1–12.
5.     Biermann, F., et al. (2014). Global Governance and the Emergence of Global Environmental Institutions. Global Environmental Politics , 12(1), 1–22.
6.     Bodansky, D. (2010). The art and craft of international environmental law . Harvard University Press.
7.     Böcher, M., & Vestergaard, O. (2015). Regional Environmental Governance: The Role of Regional Organizations. Environmental Politics , 24(3), 385–404.
8.     Chayes, A., Chayes, A. H., & Burger, R. M. (1991). Compliance with International Agreements to Protect the Ozone Layer. International Organization, 45(2), 187–227. https://doi. org/10. 1017/S0020818300034851
9.     Davis, K., & Slobodian, L. (2020). Social Inequality and Environmental Justice. Environmental Sociology , 6(1), 24–35.
10.  FAO. (2022). The state of the world’s forests . Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
11.  González, A. (2023). Cultural Perspectives on Environmental Justice. Environmental Justice , 7(2), 56–63.
12.  Hajer, M., et al. (2015). The Politics of Environmental Governance. Global Environmental Change , 35, 1–10.
13.  Harrison, R. (2022). Challenges in Environmental Litigation. Journal of Environmental Law , 34(2), 15–29.
14.  Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level governance and European integration . Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
15.  Howitt, R. E., et al. (2021). The Economic Impact of California's Drought. California Agriculture , 75(2), 40–50.
16.  Ibeanu, O. (2018). Oil and the Environment in Nigeria: The Case of the Niger Delta. Environmental Politics , 27(1), 12–29.
17.  IPCC. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis . Cambridge University Press.
18.  Kraft, M. E. (2011). Environmental policy: New directions for the twenty-first century . CQ Press.
19.  Kingsbury, B. (2004). Indigenous Peoples in 21st Century World Politics: Reorienting International Law. In M. Scheinin (Ed.), Yearbook of minority rights issues 2004 (pp. 15–30). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
20.  Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N., & Stewart, R. B. (2005). The Emergence of Global Administrative Law. European Journal of International Law , 16(1), 15–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chh162
21.  Mäler, K.-G., & Heller, L. (2022). Digital Tools for Environmental Justice. Environmental Management , 70(3), 85–95.
22.  McCaulay, D. (2016). What is energy justice? Conceptual foundations and review of empirical research. Energy Research & Social Science , 18, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.05.001
23.  Merry, S. E. (2016). The Politics of Law and Culture in the Global Era. Law & Society Review , 50(1), 102–123.
24.  Mishra, A., & Singh, R. (2022). Water Scarcity and Agriculture in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics , 77(1), 30–40.
25.  Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action . Cambridge University Press.
26.  Pauw, P. (2021). Engaging Civil Society in Environmental Decision-Making. Journal of Environmental Management , 287, 112–124.
27.  Pauw, P., & Fischer, M. (2022). Engaging Civil Society in Environmental Decision-Making. Journal of Environmental Management , 290, 65–78.
28.  Sands, P. (2015). Principles of international environmental law . Cambridge University Press.
29.  Sands, P. (2018). Principles of international environmental law . Cambridge University Press.
30.  Wenz, P. S. (1988). Environmental justice . University of Arizona Press.
31.  Wolf, A. T., & Newton, J. (2022). Managing Water Conflicts: Lessons from Around the World. Global Environmental Politics , 22(3), 35–45.
32.  Young, O. R. (2002). The institutional dimensions of environmental change: Fit, interplay, and scale . MIT Press.
33.  Young, O. R. (2019). The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change. Global Environmental Politics , 19(2), 1–19.