عنوان مقاله [English]
Although the issue of economic crimes and the need to fight against it in recent decades has always been one of the concerns of the officials and the government in Iran, but the dream of this phenomenon has been brought up from time to time and after a while it has been forgotten without achieving any results. has been In this way, the symbolic emphasis on the issue of combating economic crimes and disregarding expert and scientific opinions has caused pragmatism to penetrate into the criminal policy of economic crimes in such a way that the acquisition of political image by government trustees in the eyes of public opinion is one of their main goals. It is considered in the fight against economic crimes. The main reason for such a trend among policymakers is that economic crimes have reduced trust in the government and encourage them to play an effective role in fighting these crimes in public opinion. Such an approach overshadows the real fight against economic crimes and leads it to populist methods. The main question of the current research, which has been conducted according to a descriptive-analytical approach, is what are the changes in the elements of economic crime in Iran's criminal policy with an emphasis on jurisprudence standards? The result of the present research is that according to the harmless rule, the rule of blocking the arms, etc., the elements of economic crime should be considered as two pillars in most crimes.