نوع مقاله : مقاله های برگرفته از رساله و پایان نامه
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق عمومی، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
2 دانشیار گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
3 استادیار گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشکدۀ حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران ، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The influential current of thought in political thought seeks to remove the concept of sovereignty and introduces several rulers as its replacement, so that this concept can be used instead in the field of public law. In this article, while explaining the sovereignty, the feeling of eliminating the existing shortcomings regarding the meaning of this widely used word and its necessity adds to the importance and necessity of this research more than ever. In this research, these questions are answered, whether the concept of sovereignty is declining and eliminated in the thought of modern public law? Does the sovereignty in the position of representation enjoy the independence of the political thing and explain the fundamental concept in the thought of modern public rights? However, the developments in the field of public law have made the necessity of the concept of sovereignty face new challenges, and some political researchers consider the concept of sovereignty to be unnecessary and perhaps eliminate it for the benefit of public law, and they believe that political power is a vacuum arising from It fills and compensates for the sovereignty. However, despite the aforementioned thought process, it seems that such a perception of sovereignty is caused by a lack of correct understanding of the relevant aspects of the concept of sovereignty (political and legal perception) and a misunderstanding of the term modern public law itself.
کلیدواژهها [English]