جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی منطقه‌ای

جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی منطقه‌ای

بررسی ویژگی ها و مزایای به اشتراک گذاری خدمات و محصولات ‏ساختمانی و تأثیر آن بر بهبود فرآیندهای ساخت و ساز ‏

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی -پژوهشی کاربردی

نویسندگان
1 کارشناس ارشد، دانشکده فنی مهندسی، دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران
2 کارشناس ارشد، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه صنعتی شریف، تهران، ایران
10.22034/jgeoq.2024.275629.2952
چکیده
صنعت ساخت و ساز در حال تغییر پارادایم به سمت خدمات مشترک به عنوان وسیله ای برای بهبود کارایی، کاهش هزینه ها ‏و ارتقای پایداری است. این مطالعه به بررسی پذیرش، ادراکات و تأثیرات خدمات مشترک در صنعت ساختمان در ایران می ‏پردازد. با استفاده از روش ترکیبی، داده ها از 150 متخصص ساخت و ساز از طریق نظرسنجی و مصاحبه جمع آوری شد. این ‏مطالعه آگاهی، نگرش، الگوهای استفاده، و مزایا و چالش های درک شده از خدمات مشترک را بررسی می کند. یافته‌ها سطح ‏متوسطی از آگاهی و ادراکات مثبت از خدمات مشترک را نشان می‌دهند، با صرفه‌جویی در هزینه، افزایش کارایی و بهره‌وری ‏بهبود یافته به عنوان مزایای کلیدی. با این حال، چالش هایی مانند مقاومت در برابر تغییر و موانع فنی مانع پذیرش گسترده ‏خدمات مشترک می شود. این مطالعه همچنین تاثیر خدمات مشترک بر بهره وری، کارایی، هزینه ها، مدیریت مالی و پایداری ‏محیطی را بررسی می کند. تجزیه و تحلیل آماری و بینش‌های کیفی، پیشرفت‌های قابل‌توجهی در بهره‌وری و کارایی نسبت ‏داده‌شده به خدمات مشترک، همراه با کاهش قابل‌توجه هزینه و مزایای زیست‌محیطی را روشن می‌کند. بر اساس یافته‌ها، ‏توصیه‌هایی برای افزایش آگاهی، ارتقای همکاری، پرداختن به موانع تکنولوژیکی، بهبود حمایت نظارتی و ارزیابی اثرات ‏زیست‌محیطی و اجتماعی ارائه شده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Examining the features and characteristics of sharing decision-making services and products and its impact on the improvement of construction processes

نویسندگان English

mohamadali harfat 1
Mahdi Rahmati 2
1 Senior Expert, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Unit, Tehran, Iran
2 Master's degree, Faculty of Management, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

The construction industry is undergoing a paradigm shift towards shared services as a means to improve efficiency, reduce costs and promote sustainability. This study examines the acceptance, perceptions and effects of shared services in the construction industry in Iran. Using a mixed method, data were collected from 150 construction professionals through surveys and interviews. This study examines awareness, attitudes, usage patterns, and perceived benefits and challenges of shared services. Findings show a moderate level of awareness and positive perceptions of shared services, with cost savings, increased efficiency and improved productivity as key benefits. However, challenges such as resistance to change and technical barriers hinder the widespread adoption of shared services. This study also examines the impact of shared services on productivity, efficiency, costs, financial management and environmental sustainability. Statistical analysis and qualitative insights illuminate significant improvements in productivity and efficiency attributed to shared services, along with significant cost reductions and environmental benefits. Based on the findings, recommendations are made to increase awareness, promote collaboration, address technological barriers, improve regulatory support, and assess environmental and social impacts. This study contributes to the growing research on shared services in the construction industry and provides insights and guidance for practitioners, policymakers, and researchers seeking to use shared services to increase efficiency and

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Productivity
sustainability
construction industry
shared services
Alaloul, W. S., Liew, M., Zawawi, N. A. W. A., & Kennedy, I. B. (2020). Industrial Revolution 4.0 in the construction industry: Challenges and opportunities for stakeholders. Ain shams engineering journal, 11(1), 225-230. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.08.010
Apraku, K., Bondinuba, F., Eyiah, A., & Sadique, A. (2020). Construction workers work-life balance: A tool for improving productivity in the construction industry. Social Work and Social Welfare, 2, 45-52. doi:https://doi.org/10.25082/SWSW.2020.01.001
Benachio, G. L. F., Freitas, M. d. C. D., & Tavares, S. F. (2020). Circular economy in the construction industry: A systematic literature review. Journal of cleaner production, 260, 121046. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121046
Bergeron, B. (2002). Essentials of shared services (Vol. 26): John Wiley & Sons.
Bondarouk, T., & Friebe, C.-M. (2014). Shared services—standardization, formalization, and control: a structured literature review. Shared services as a new organizational form, 39-65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/S1877-636120140000013003
Cheng, B., Huang, J., Guo, Z., Li, J., & Chen, H. (2023). Towards sustainable construction through better construction and demolition waste management practices: a SWOT analysis of Suzhou, China. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(15), 2614-2624. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2081406
Cooke-Davies, T. J., & Arzymanow, A. (2003). The maturity of project management in different industries: An investigation into variations between project management models. International Journal of Project Management, 21(6), 471-478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00084-4
Fitriani, H., & Ajayi, S. (2023). Barriers to sustainable practices in the Indonesian construction industry. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 66(10), 2028-2050. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2022.2057281
Hafez, F. S., Sa'di, B., Safa-Gamal, M., Taufiq-Yap, Y., Alrifaey, M., Seyedmahmoudian, M., . . . Mekhilef, S. (2023). Energy efficiency in sustainable buildings: a systematic review with taxonomy, challenges, motivations, methodological aspects, recommendations, and pathways for future research. Energy Strategy Reviews, 45, 101013. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.101013
Hwang, B.-G., Ngo, J., & Teo, J. Z. K. (2022). Challenges and strategies for the adoption of smart technologies in the construction industry: The case of Singapore. Journal of Management in Engineering, 38(1), 05021014. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000986
Katyare, P., & Joshi, S. (2022). Construction Productivity Analysis in Construction Industry: An Indian Perspective. Paper presented at the Proceeding of International Conference on Computational Science and Applications: ICCSA 2021.
Kuznets, S. (1973). Modern economic growth: findings and reflections. The American economic review, 63(3), 247-258. doi:https://www.jstor.org/stable/1914358
Miskon, S., Bandara, W., Fielt, E., & Gable, G. (2010). Understanding shared services: An exploration of the IS literature. International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications (IJESMA), 2(4), 60-75. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jesma.2010100105
Moshood, T. D., Rotimi, J. O., & Shahzad, W. (2024). Enhancing sustainability considerations in construction industry projects. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04946-2
Munaro, M. R., & Tavares, S. F. (2023). A review on barriers, drivers, and stakeholders towards the circular economy: The construction sector perspective. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 8, 100107. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100107
Ortiz, O., Castells, F., & Sonnemann, G. (2009). Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA. Construction and building materials, 23(1), 28-39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.012
Ramphal, R. (2013). A literature review on shared services. African Journal of Business Management, 7(1), 1. doi:https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM12.1202
Sacks, R., Girolami, M., & Brilakis, I. (2020). Building information modelling, artificial intelligence and construction tech. Developments in the Built Environment, 4, 100011. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2020.100011
Singh, A. K., Kumar, V. P., Dehdasht, G., Mohandes, S. R., Manu, P., & Rahimian, F. P. (2023). Investigating the barriers to the adoption of blockchain technology in sustainable construction projects. Journal of cleaner production, 403, 136840. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136840