نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی -پژوهشی کاربردی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
In recent decades, the Salafi-jihadi discourse has become one of the most influential currents in the political and geographical space of Islamic countries by redefining fundamental concepts such as Dar al-Islam, Dar al-Kufr, Hijra, and Jihad. Contrary to traditional jurisprudential readings, this discourse refers to Dar al-Islam exclusively as a land where the absolute rule of Sharia is established and considers any human government or legislation to be an example of kufr. In addition to accusing many governments, rulers, and even Muslims of apostasy, this type of view has also had widespread consequences in the field of human geography. The present article examines the theoretical and field dimensions of this discourse using a descriptive, analytical method and an interdisciplinary jurisprudential and geographical approach. The findings show that the Salafi interpretation of jurisprudential concepts has led to the emergence of spatially-based violence, population displacement, ideological migrations, the destruction of residential order, and the collapse of cultural cohesion in the Islamic world. In contrast, Imami jurisprudence, by providing humane criteria in the definition of Dar al-Islam, including the majority of Muslims, freedom of worship, and the principle of istishab, enables peaceful coexistence in pluralistic societies. Finally, by presenting alternative models such as the concepts of Dar al-Hudnah, Dar al-Istaman, and the jurisprudence of interaction, the article proposes solutions to counter extremism and rebuild a spatial order based on justice, rationality, and human security.
کلیدواژهها English
